Degemer »
Ar gummuniezh »
Danevelloù bog »
Danevell n°77761
An holl danevelloù
{THIS_GAME_BUGS}
#77761: "Tournament Points Option 1 for Winner and 0 for Everyone Else"
#77761: "Tournament Points Option 1 for Winner and 0 for Everyone Else"
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Kinnig : d'am soñj e c'hellfe kement-se gwellaat a galz emplementadur al lec'hienn
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Kinnig : d'am soñj e c'hellfe kement-se gwellaat a galz emplementadur al lec'hienn
Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn
M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
When creating a swiss system tournament, the only options for distributing points are:
..., +6, +4, +2, 0
+6, +5, +3, +1, 0, 0, 0 ...
I'd like a new option to be:
1, 0, 0, 0, ...
Only the game's winner gets a point and everyone else gets 0 points.
That would work so much better for many games, especially team games where one team wins and another team loses, like Good Cop Bad Cop or Codenames. Otherwise everyone on the winning team gets 6 points on the losing team gets 5 points.
Getting 5 instead of 6 is fine because it's basically the same as 0 instead of 1, but the real problem is when someone drops from a game or runs out of time and points are awarded based on time left such as 6, 5, 3, 1, 0, etc. It means that if you are in a game where someone runs out of time and you happened to have one of the lower amounts of time left, you could get ~1 point. Getting 1 point because someone else ran out of time when actually losing a game gives you 5 points is not right. You could not recover from it in a tournament.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v108
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
18. Ker 2022 15:21 • Pull the Pin Games • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
Screenshot:
i.imgur.com/IT1A7VK.png
i.imgur.com/IT1A7VK.png
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
Ouzhpennit amañ mar-plij, tout ar pezh a c'hellfe bezañ talvoudus evit ma c'hellfemp dreveziñ ar bog-mañ pe kompren ho kinnig:
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
Cheñch statud an danevell e :
bug?id=77761
