#102230: "Return of the joint endgame"

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
When the game was released, the last two phases "double or nothing" and "validation" were played together, as it should be in this kind of games. But it seems to have changed recently, now one player alone decides on these last two phases and the others only find out in the "finished games section" what the other players have written and to which ending this led. Thus depriving the players of the pleasure of resolving and deciding together, after the first two phases were played virtually every man for himself. THIS REDUCED THE GAME FUN ENORMOUSLY, slips thereby in BGG ranking spoken for me from 9 to 5. For others as well as you can read in the game forum.
PLEASE RESTORE THE OLD STATE OF DECIDING AND DISCUSSING TOGETHER, so that it is fun again, thank you. OR MAKE IT AT LEAST AN OPTION as I understand that some players may prefer the faster 'one player decides aka less fun' version.
The most sensible option would MAYBE A 'MAJORITY DECIDES after all players have had at least 2 turns OPTION' in the 'double or nothing' and in the validation phase.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5

What is this report about?

Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan

Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan

Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn

Deskrivadur dre ar munud

Roll-istor an danevelloù bog

Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ

Cheñch statud an danevell e :

Skoazell

Kemer perzh

Heuliit ac'hanomp