• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?