#85323: "My opponent's move ended early and kutakatia was declared, which didn't make sense"
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
The north player was executing a kutakata move and suddenly his pieces stopped moving around the board and a kutakatia was declared. This makes no sense because he shoulnd't have stopped, and he has more than one capture move available (wrong conditions for kutakatia)• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
Move number 23 (North)• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
But up front: Kutakatia is about 1 pit being blocked because it is the only harvest, not from how many pits one could reach it (see Nino's book, definition of Kutakatia).
You did a kutakata in move 23, leaving pit a3 as your only possible harvest for next round. It does not matter, if it is reachable from different pits (as it was from A3 and B6), only that there is a single pit to harvest - thus it was blocked for your opponent when doing a kutakata (marked black in game).
With his move a2, which was a kutakata, he would have emptied a3 after going around the board, which is not allowed, thus the move has to stop.
So everything is fine here. In case you have Nino's book (English version), you'll find an example explaining exactly that situation on page 85/86.
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.