#81001: "karma penalty for negative clock. "
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn
M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus ul lennad skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. M'ho peus ul lennad skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus ul lennad skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
There should be a karma penalty for running out of time at anytime during a game. I'd suggest 2-5 karma points as I think you should lose more points for a negative clock than you gain for a game without a negative clock (currently 1), so that there is a clear incentive for playing within the time consistently, while allowing for exceptional circumstances.
Rationale:
We should be encouraging people to play within the time frames agreed at the start of the game.
The only penalty currently available is to kick players out of the game. This is pretty heavy-handed for a minor infringement and creates the option for other players to end the game when they're losing, which I've seen several complaints about. This penalty option should be retained, but adding a moderate disincentive should reduce the need for this.
It's better to use an automatic punishment than a player option because it reduces the opportunity for strategic abuse.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v109
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- M'ho peus ul lennad skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.