#79532: "Enforce simultaneity"
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn
M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
-
• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
This is between a suggestion and a bug.
As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.
I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.
( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )
This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v102
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
