#584: "The game didn't end when opponent's house has no seeds."
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
This game didn't end when opponent's house has no seeds.
It had to end immediately, but game was continue.• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
Move n°52 to n°53• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
Another adaptation of Kalah is end at same situation.
Please tell me exact all conditions of game end at this adaptation.
This case is a bug.
The conditions of end of game at this adaption:
1) A player, at his move, is unable to move. The game ends and the remaining stones are captured by his opponent.
2) A player has more than half of all stones in his kalah.
At your case:
Move 53:
Masschy plays 1 stones from a hole n°6
Masschy places 1 stones into his/her Kalah
Masschy gets additional move, because last stone falls in Kalah. Masschy is unable to move at the additional move (no stones in his holes). Game has to be ended (condition 1 of end of game), but it was continued.
This is a BUG. I will correct this bug soon.
Does BGA's adaption have different rule?
The game ends at two cases:
When a player, at his turn, is unable to move, because his no longer has any stones in any of his holes. The remaining stones are captured by his opponent.
OR
When a player collected more half of all stones in his/her Kalah.
I'm sure that it's the most logical variant of end of the game.
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.