• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

Hello,

Arena game - unlike casual games - automatically accept queued games, regardless if everyone is actually present. This is understandable from a certain point of view: in competitive gaming, you shouldn't be able to pick you opponents, as they are shown when accepting a casual game.

However, I've noticed several people - including myself - missing out on their Arena games simply because they haven't noticed that the games have started. This can be due to several reasons, some of which can be attributed to the player being AFK, while others can not. E.g. playing without sounds (for obvious reasons e.g. during quiet time) or with multiple tabs open (which sometimes miss out on sound ques, I think).

The problem is regardless simply avoidable. Also, from an opponents perspective it's better for the game not to start at all, instead of having to wait ~3 minutes to kick someone out. My simple solution for the problem is:

Extend the "Accept game"-feature into Arena game (as on casual games), but simply remove the showing of opponents in the accept screen. I'm sure this would greatly improve the BGA experience by removing unneccesary downtime for everyone with no apparent downside.

Thanks for your great work guys!

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?