#34580: "Reputation penalty for not accepting or rejecting game start"
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn
M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus ul lennad skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. M'ho peus ul lennad skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus ul lennad skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
Some games require several players. It is very annoying to wait for enough players, only to then realize that one of the players has left or stopped paying attention and doesn't respond to the ready/accept game start prompt. Often this results in the other players leaving as well because there is no longer a quorum.
When you join a game, you are not committing to play, but I think you should be considered as committing to decide promptly whether you are or are not going to play. Once the game is started and it is waiting for you to say you're ready, there should be a short timer (say 1 minute). Players who don't respond within this time frame should receive a small karma penalty. Perhaps not as much as leaving a game in progress, but a penalty nonetheless. Note that it would be equally fine to click "no" and thus leave the game or to click "ready" and begin the game; the penalty would only be applied if the player did not respond to the prompt at all.
Otherwise, people can waste others' time by joining games but never actually starting them or leaving them.• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v87
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
If you don't want to play then don't join the table.
This behavior should be punished.
There should be a second sound after the game started after some time.
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- M'ho peus ul lennad skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.