#34529: "Google Chrome v88"
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn
M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! -
• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! -
• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! -
• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! -
• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! -
• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
The designer of Polis has made the following "siege variant" that grew out of the 1st edition part of the standard rules in the 2nd edition of the game. Basically, it gives players a +1 (or greater) bonus to future siege rolls after then fail a siege. Here is an excerpt from the new rulebook (link to the rulebook pasted below as well):
"If the siege is unsuccessful, the player who executed the siege loses one of their Hoplites from the territory in which the siege was attempted and places a disc of their color, called a Siege disk, with their Hoplites next to the recently besieged Polis. If that Polis happens to be under the control of their opponent, then the opponent must lose 1 Population cube from the matching Polis card.... An unsuccessful siege can be repeated in later turns if the player meets the requirements and decides to take another siege action. In this case, the player receives a +1 modification to the die roll for each Siege disk of their color that is in that territory. The Siege disks are removed from the board immediately if the player removes or loses all their troops in that territory, if the other player attempts to lay siege to the same Polis (if it is neutral), or at the end of the round, whichever comes first."
The designer had made this variant part of the rules, and it is now the standard being used in competitive play. I'd love to see this variant/rule as an option for those who prefer to play this way. Please vote "yes" if you agree so the admins will consider adding this to the module. Thanks! Happy gaming! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v88
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
