• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

this is also a follow up regarding bug 177457

So overall the main reason it does matter is regarding negotiator and interactions thereof.
In the particular game spies is used to steal a card deal when there are two. There is no selection available which one to choose for the roman player (similar i guess with ninjas, barbarian remove deal card) which should be possible (so game error one: stealing player needs an option to choose)
Secondly, the game log only says that a card deal is taken but not which. The japenese player in this case needs to get the information which card was taken, without having already played negotiator which is currently the only time you get to see them. Which even if you remember what all your deals are you would be able in the game to remember which card is which (due to the order of play, you stack those cards one after another on top of the faction sheet acording to the rules), but with the current implementation you cannot as deals are just ordered by type and not time of play. Even if it were time of play if two similar deals are done after eachother you wouldn't know which card was taken away (i.e. two card draws in this case)

- so first the game log should not only say makes deal with $factioncardname but also
- spies steal $factioncardname
- you should always show in a hover over or similar which cards are made deals with (like negotiator)
- (if fully opposed against that for implementation we would need to track the temporal play order and not just order by ress, so a player can choose a specific deal card (whichs info was public when played (see -1)), and then it needs to be logged so the player deals are taken from knows which one in case of similar ress after each other in temporal deal play)

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

So it never says anywhere that one does not know what is in your deal stack. it should be lookable all the time

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?