• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?