#167270: "Wrong Placement of Player Token in the shared Area"
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn
M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! -
• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! -
• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! -
• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
The game is still ongoing, but the rules violation is visible in the current state of the game. It should be Turn 26/27.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
The rules state that the steps on your turn are as follows: "Choose one of the available stacks (...) pick the top tile (...) place an Architects from your supply on the stack." (p. 4)
A stack counts as available "if it does not currently have an architect on it" (p.4). However, my opponent was able to place an architect on the same stack twice, still gaining a tile! • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
Instead of selecting a tile where an architect is it looks like your opponent was able to play again the same tile he already played, maybe a temporary issue in BGA, maybe something he was able to trick, it would be interesting to know what he did.
I'm afraid I can't do anything with that concrete move but I've included an extra check to make sure the tile is part of the valid list offered to the player.
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
