• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?