#143329: "LAUNDRY#1 description is wrong ?"
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn
M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. -
• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
At move#32
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. -
• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
At move#32
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
-
• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
-
• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. -
• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
At move#32
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
-
• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. -
• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
At move#32
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
-
• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
At move#32
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
-
• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. -
• Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
At move#32
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
The description of LAUNDRY#1 action is :
If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game.
So at table #578546559, move#32, my opponent made a prank and he lost a victory die.
In that situation both mine and opponent's cookie die were at 1.
So, for LAUDRY#1, who should have the cookie die to 1 ? to one makes the prank or the one who dodge the prank ?
Who will lose the victory die ?
The corresponding action is :
${player_name} pranks opponent, cookie die is 1 so they lose a victory die
So this seems the opposite of LAUNDRY#1 card description.
Please clarify the expected behavior and in case please correct LAUNDRY#1 description so then we could adjust the translations accordingly. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v130
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
The card tells you the rule that happens.
The card text:
"If you prank, opponent must dodge when his cookie die is a 1, otherwise they lose a victory die or the game."
Normally the rule is - if you prank then the opponent loses a cookie - if possible.
So if they have 2+ on the black dice they will lose a point.
If they have 1 on the black dice they are safe and don't lose a point.
However Laundry#1 changes this, if the person who pranks has done their Laundry then the opponent will lose a victory dice in this case.
mandersuun pranks you. mandersuun has Laundry#6. Your cookie die is a 1.
The rule applies to mandersuun, and it says their opponent (you) MUST dodge otherwise face the consquence.
1. my opponent mandersuun had LAUNDRY#1 and made a prank (the value of his cookie die is irrelevant for this case)
2. my cookie die was a 1
3. I did not dodge the prank
Am I right ? Please confirm so I can better adapt the italian translation
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
