#133510: "The opponent intentionally did not counted a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed."
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn
M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v127
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
Because of my first experience with this, I managed to save my game in this way:
My opponent & I passed. My opponent refused to mark the dead stones. When the question came, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?", I naturally answered, "yes". I kept playing and killed enough groups to make the game clearly won, and when we both passed, there was no re-counting of dead stones.
Sure enough, my opponent had selected "no", as I suspected he would.
This clearly promotes cheating. The proposed solutions are as follows, going from best to worst:
1) An algorithm that automatically designates dead stones.
2) NO QUESTION about having another stage for designating stones. Since there was already one stage, but the players COULDN'T AGREE, that means that there AUTOMATICALLY needs to be another round of dead stone designation. This should just happen every time.
3) If the question remains like it does now, it should be that if EITHER or BOTH of the players answers "yes", then there should be a stone counting stage.
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
