#115338: "allow players to lock in their split before others have discarded"
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn
M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
-
• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Mozilla v5
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
This would speed up the game without changing anyone's available information. Lean into the simultaneous action selection.
Unfortunately, the suggestion would require a sizeable rewrite of much of the game's code. Maybe doable in development or even alpha, but that was over a year ago.
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
