• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?