An holl danevelloù
quantum_displayed danevelloù bog
#10697: "using scrappy with reconfigure, you can end up with the same ship you started with"
Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan
Reolennoù : ur reolenn deus ar c'hoari n'eo ket bet doujet outi
Deskrivadur dre ar munud
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
"When reconfiguring, you're supposed to get a different ship. The scrappy card allows you to reroll, but it's not a new reconfiguration. Therefore this should be possible: reconfigure a 5 and get a 3. Use scrappy, reroll but roll another 3.
However, this shouldn't be possible: reconfigure a 5 and get a 3. Use scrappy, reroll and get a 5. You're still reconfiguring from a 5, you can't end up with the same ship as the one you started with."• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?
168• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?
Google Chrome v67
Roll-istor an danevelloù bog
7. Eos 2018 19:33 • Ratburntro44 • N'eo ket bet eiladet c'hoazh ar bog gant an diorroerien:
This was previously reported as bug #3083 and incorrectly set as fixed
14. Gwe 2018 15:25 • CraWleR • Kadarnaet eo bet ar bog gant an diorroerien:
Confirmed the behaviour, however I wouldn't necessarily call it a bug. People in Board Game Geek had a discussion about it as well: boardgamegeek.com/thread/1759804/scrappy-reroll-during-reconfigure
Like someone said, this should probably be a house rule. I would say especially since the game designer didn't really explain that situation.
I would tend to agree with Ratburntro44 and would change this if the game was still in beta, however right now we should be looking for alternative solutions such as allowing the users to change the behaviour of this card while creating a table. Judging by how "user friendly" table creations on BGA are - I'd put this in low priority queue.
Like someone said, this should probably be a house rule. I would say especially since the game designer didn't really explain that situation.
I would tend to agree with Ratburntro44 and would change this if the game was still in beta, however right now we should be looking for alternative solutions such as allowing the users to change the behaviour of this card while creating a table. Judging by how "user friendly" table creations on BGA are - I'd put this in low priority queue.
4. Meu 2019 14:12 • Torinapu • Kadarnaet eo bet ar bog gant an diorroerien:
This is a bug.
Rerolling does not change the initial ship's value and using the card should have repeated the roll (with the same base number) and not to perform another reconfigure action (with an unaccepted base value).
Table #49171087
Moves #197-198
Rerolling does not change the initial ship's value and using the card should have repeated the roll (with the same base number) and not to perform another reconfigure action (with an unaccepted base value).
Table #49171087
Moves #197-198
23. Ebr 2020 16:45 • Jekka • Kadarnaet eo bet ar bog gant an diorroerien:
Can confirm this happen to me before. didn't know is was against the rules.
Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ
Ouzhpennit amañ mar-plij, tout ar pezh a c'hellfe bezañ talvoudus evit ma c'hellfemp dreveziñ ar bog-mañ pe kompren ho kinnig:
- Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
- Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
- Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
- M'ho peus un dapadenn skramm eus ar gudenn (ho pezit soñj d'eus se !), gellout a rit implij Imgur.com evit e bellgargañ hag eilañ/pegañ al liamm amañ.
