• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit ar gemennadenn fazi a zo war ho skramm, ma zo unan.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Displegit deomp, mar-plij, ar pezh ho poa c'hoant d'ober, ar pezh ho peus graet hag ar pezh a zo c'hoarvezet 'benn ar fin

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Petra oa diskouezet war ar skramm pa 'z oc'h chomet stanket (Skramm goullo ? Ul lodenn eus etrefas ar c'hoari ? Kemennadenn fazi ?)

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Pesseurt reolenn n'eo ket doujet gant azasadenn ar c'hoari-mañ ?

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Ha posupl eo gwelet torridigezh ar reolenn e replay ar bartienn ? Ma 'z eo ya, da be niverenn taol ?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Peseurt taol ho peus c'hoant c'hoari ?

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Petra emaoc'h o klask ober evit delankañ an ober c'hoari-mañ ?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Da be bazenn ar bartienn eo en em gavet ar gudenn (petra oa testenn kemenn ar c'hoari) ?

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, diskrivit kudenn an diskwel. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Mar-plij, eilit/pegit an destenn e Saozneg ha n'eo ket en ho yezh. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ha dibres eo an destenn-mañ er sistem treiñ? Ma ya, daoust ha troet eo bet ouzhpenn 24 eur 'zo ?

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?

• Displegit ho kinnig mar-plij, e berrgomzoù met en un doare resis, evit ma vefe an aesañ posupl kompren mat ar pezh ho peus c'hoant lâret.

In this game, it is almost impossible to lower down the difficulty of shots under 3, and thus if there's always a roll on 1 or 2 on important points, not only all strategies will be useless but also the player who consume stars to lower the difficulty will fall into disadvantage after such roll.

I understand that Worldwide Tennis is definitely a dice game which contains element of luck. However, if there's no measures controlling the extend that luck could impact on, this boardgame will become a purely dice game without any strategic factor. Moreover, player will lose their playing experience everytime a roll on 1 or 2 (especially on crucial shots).

The easiest way to solve this is to change the rule. " If a player rolls 1 or 2, the roll will not be counted and he could roll the dice again, until he rolls out 3 or above. " Under this rule, there's still plenty of luck factor in the game, but players could strategically hit a 100% safe shot by using 3 stars in a shot, if they consider that shot is crucial.

• Peseurt merdeer eo hoc'h hini ?