Danevell • Board Game Arena

An holl danevelloù

terramystica_displayed danevelloù bog

#102169: "Architechts cannot move a bridge from a town even though the remaining town would be large enough"

fixed: Kempennet eo bet ar bog

?

terramystica #431256959

Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan

An etrefas he deus miret ouzhin da c'hoari taolioù aotreet gant reolenn ar c'hoari koulskoude

Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan

An etrefas he deus miret ouzhin da c'hoari taolioù aotreet gant reolenn ar c'hoari koulskoude

Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn

M'oc'h a-du, VOTIT evit an danevell-mañ. An danevelloù gant ar muiañ a vouezhioù a vo studiet DA GENTAÑ !

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Deskrivadur dre ar munud

Roll-istor an danevelloù bog

24. Oct 2023 18:13 • Xevoc • N'eo ket bet eiladet c'hoazh ar bog gant an diorroerien:

I had town with SA, bridge, D, TP, another bridge and behind that bridge D and TP. The part with SA, bridge, D and TP is large enough for a town so I should have been able to move the other bridge using SH action, but game didn't allow me to do it. I think the check for being able to support the town doesn't take other bridges appropriately into account.

2. Nov 2023 18:21 • Exline • N'eo ket bet eiladet c'hoazh ar bog gant an diorroerien:

boardgamearena.com/9/terramystica?table=430263395

Experiencing a similar issue here in this live game.

I have a town with SH, 2 bridges, and 4 dwellings. Town marker is on d6. Also have a town in the center stretch with SA, 3 dwellings, and a bridge.

Attempting to move the bridge from d6-c5 down to d6-e8. My understanding - and I believe this has worked in the past - is that this should be legal because the bridge moving ability should check for town legality upon resolution of the bridge move. The d6 space with the town marker would be in a legal town grouping post bridge move (as it would now be bridged to the existing center town).

The game gives me the same error as Xevoc.

6. Nov 2023 18:40 • Exline • N'eo ket bet eiladet c'hoazh ar bog gant an diorroerien:

update: I thought my above issue was related to Xevoc's with not counting bridges as part of a town or something, but now I believe it is actually the mis-reporting of this linked issue as a bug which has caused the architects to lose functionality:

boardgamearena.com/bug?id=98107

Based on the verbiage as written on the SH, this is not a bug.

25. Nov 2023 20:41 • Moonsteel • N'eo ket bet eiladet c'hoazh ar bog gant an diorroerien:

boardgamearena.com/6/terramystica?table=439387022

Same error according to r1234

Its at the end

E3:tp - D3:sh - D3/C2:bridge - C2:d - C2/D4:Bridge - D4:d - E6:tp - F3:te - G2:sa - F3/G1:bridge - G1:d

the F3/G1:bridge should be movable since with it moved the town has enough power and buildings left to even satisfy 2 towns.

25. Nov 2023 20:46 • Moonsteel • N'eo ket bet eiladet c'hoazh ar bog gant an diorroerien:

Clarification, town tile location:
E3:tp - D3:sh - D3/C2:bridge - C2:d<TW6> - C2/D4:Bridge - D4:d - E6:tp - F3:te - G2:sa<TW1> - F3/G1:bridge - G1:d

<TW6> - 2cult 2key 2vp
<TW1> - 6c 5vp

25. Nov 2023 22:55 • _Yotsuba_ • N'eo ket bet eiladet c'hoazh ar bog gant an diorroerien:

I'm guessing that in Terra Mystica #431256959 there is some sort of issue with two town tiles being in the same big town. I'm thinking the game wants that to be two sepearate towns to allow a bridge move. If that is the case, I dont think the wording of the rules support that.

26. Nov 2023 18:54 • r1234 • N'eo ket bet eiladet c'hoazh ar bog gant an diorroerien:

Table #439387022
Move #308
Progression 84%

Same issue. The rules clearly should allow me to move the lowest of my three red bridges somewhere -- but that bridge (and the upper left red bridge, by my reading the rules) produce an error: "This Bridge can not be moved as it would break an existing Town".

28. Nov 2023 11:28 • Rincevent123 • Kempennet eo bet ar bog:

Official solution from the game publisher:
When moving a bridge, check if any town marker on either side of the old
or new location of the bridge is affected by it. Each town marker still
needs to be supported by a sufficient number and power value of
buildings (and/or bridges). If the move of the bridge would make 2 (or
more) town markers part of the same town, the town needs to have a
sufficient number and power value of buildings to support ALL town
markers. So for example, joining 2 town markers means you need 8
buildings with a power value of 14 (or 7 buildings of the Sanctuary is
part of the town).

I updated the BGA implementation accordingly

Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ

Ouzhpennit amañ mar-plij, tout ar pezh a c'hellfe bezañ talvoudus evit ma c'hellfemp dreveziñ ar bog-mañ pe kompren ho kinnig:

Niverenn taol all / Niverenn ar fiñv
Ha renket eo bet ar gudenn gant an douchenn F5 ?
Ha c'hoarvezet eo ar gudenn meur a wech ? Bewech ? Cheñch-dicheñch ?
If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

nullañ Hizivaat an danevell

#102169: "Architechts cannot move a bridge from a town even though the remaining town would be large enough"

?

Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan

Petra a zo c'hoarvezet ? Trugarez evit dibab amañ dindan

Gwiriit mar-plij ma n'eus ket dija un danevell evit an hevelep dodenn

Deskrivadur dre ar munud

Roll-istor an danevelloù bog

Ouzhpennañ un dra bennak d'an danevell-mañ

Cheñch statud an danevell e :

Skoazell

Kemer perzh

Navigate

Heuliit ac'hanomp